DADM Conference 5th of October 2020

6. September 2020 10:37 by Lene Haastrup in

The availbe powerpoint presentaions are found under each subject in the program below.

Thank you for a good conference.

The DADM board is looking for more subjects to present this year.

If you have any ideas, please mail danskforeningfordatamanagement@gmail.com

Kind regards 

DADM board

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Despite the situation, DADM is still going strong. The rules in Pharma have forced us to hold the annual conference online. The conference will take place on 5th of October 2020.

We have collected several speakers and exiting topics, as you see in this program

After the event, you are invited for dinner in real life in Lyngby.

 

_________________________________________________________________________________

 

 

 

DADM Conference 05 October 2020

Venue

Only speakers and the board

 Novo Nordisk, Vandtårnsvej 108

Søborg

Contact

Frank Jensen

 

No dinner

 

Account number

1551 7952110490

(Danske Bank)

Contact

Lene Haastrup (treasurer)

 

Schedule

Activity

Speaker(s)

09.30-09.45

Welcome & Intro

 

Katja Bernstein & Frank Jensen

09.45-12.00

Audit Trail – what is the expectation from DHMA to the Sponsors

(see below)

Ib Alstrup, DHMA (Lægemiddelstyrelsen)

 IBAL_DKMA_QA.pptx (3.20 mb)

 

Questions and break

 

 

Highligths from the new eClinical Forum paper on Audit Trail review

Jennifer Logue Nielsen, Novo Nordisk

ATR_DADM_05OCT2020.pptx (4.40 mb)

 

Questions

 

12-13.45

Lunch break

 

13.45-14.30

Cloud Computing – in a GxP context

Questions 

Kasper Nørgaard Andersen, Senior Consultant, AlfaNordic

 

14.30-15.15

Data protection – in a clinical context

 

Data management and GDPR - what should you know?

The most recent news on status as a data controller or data processor and joint controllership

Requirements to agreements with suppliers, security breaches and why transfers of personal data to the U.S. may become a material challenge.

Questions 

Director, attorney (CIPP/E) Daiga Grunte-Sonne, Kromann Reumert

 Data_management_and_GDPR.pptx (2.94 mb)

15.15-16.00

Investigator Experience from Participation in a Clinical Study

Investigator Christine Dali

PI_experiences_presentation_Oct_5_2020.pptx (2.36 mb) 

 

 Including questions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

17:30

 

18:00

 

Dinner cancelled

All

 

 

IB Alstrup, DADM questions raised on beforehand:

Decommisioning:

  • How should sponsors document the system functionality? Are PDF files including the data and pictures of how they were gathered (blank CRFs) sufficient?
  • Investigators access to data. Is it fine to revoke the access when sponsor have received acceptance of receipt of the hard drive containing the data from sites?
  • Audit trail. Is it fine to have this as PDF file only (hard to search for specific data changes)?

Ongoing:

  • How much review of the audit trail is expected from the regulators? (Please provide examples of which kind of data and reviews you will expect us to look at) Is it sufficient to look for trends ‘by sites’ and ‘by data items’?

 New devices/ways of collecting data:

  • Before starting working with a new system, what QC is expected to the audit trail functionality? How is this dependent of whether the system is seen as SAAS (Software As A Service)
  • BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). What to focus on when documenting why data is collected this way? – When is better patient compliance outweighing the risk for ‘wrong’ data (registered by someone else or local setting changed)?
  • Automatic data collection tools (e.g. activity trackers). What to focus on when documenting which data are used? In general a data mining is taking place and the algorithm is not known to the sponsor. Do we need to archive the raw data, or could the data mining result be defined as raw data?
  • Any new device. What to focus on when documenting why this device is used. What kind of mitigations are expected to see?
  • How are the documentation dependent on the way sponsors use the software? SAAS or sponsor ‘owned’ – and in what category do we see the mobile apps?